Page 33 - The Indian EYE 020725
P. 33

IMMIGRATION                                                       FEBRUARY 07, 2025        |  The Indian Eye 33


























































        based on his or her interpretation of  child as soon as it is born acquire H-4  by a U.S.-born adult child. Parents of  to the child born to a mother in val-
        “subject  to  the  jurisdiction  thereof”  status?  One  needs  to  be  admitted  children born after the effective date  id  H-1B  status,  but  who  also  had  a
        in the Fourteenth Amendment.  Giv-  into the US in H-4 status or change  of the executive order may no longer  pending I-485 application and is able
        en its current conservative composi-  from  another  nonimmigrant  status  have this opportunity. The executive  to  exercise  portability  under  INA  §
        tion, however, Trump is hoping that  into H-4 status. Perhaps, the Trump  order will cruelly create a permanent  204(c)? Similarly, would a child born
        the  Supreme Court may ultimately  administration  may  need  to  issue  a  underclass of noncitizens. The child  to a nonimmigrant mother be consid-
        accept  his  administration’s  reinter-  regulation recognizing H-4 status of  in H-4 status would have to leave the  ered a U.S. citizen if the father is an
        pretation  of  the  “subject  to  the  ju-  the child at the time of its birth.    As  US  when  it  turns  21  unless  it  finds  anonymous sperm donor in the U.S.?
        risdiction thereof” language and up-  we  noted  in  a  prior  blog,  the  best  a  way  to  change  to  another  nonim-  Based  on  the  plain  language  of  the
        hold the executive order. Even that  chance for Indian-born beneficiaries  migrant  status  or  obtain  permanent  executive order, it appears likely that
        is  unlikely  as  the  parents  of  a  child  of approved I-140 petitions who are  residence  independently  such  as  U.S. citizenship would not extend to
        who are undocumented or in nonim-  trapped  in  the  employment-based  through marriage with a U.S. citizen.   either of these children.
        migrant status are always subject to  second  (EB-2)  and  third  (EB-3)   The  executive  order’s  applica-  *Kaitlyn Box is a Partner at
        prosecution,  unlike a diplomat who  preference  backlogs  to  obtain  per-  tion  to  other  categories  of  children   Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC.
        enjoys immunity, and are thus subject  manent residence without waiting for  born in the U.S. is unclear. For ex-
        to the jurisdiction of the US. It is also  several decades could be sponsorship  ample, would U.S. citizenship extend
        highly  unlikely  that  nonimmigrant   ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
        parents would be considered enemies  Cyrus D. Mehta, a graduate of Cambridge University and Columbia Law School, is the Managing Partner of Cyrus D. Mehta &
        during a hostile occupation of  a part  Partners PLLC in New York City. Mr. Mehta is a member of AILA’s Administrative Litigation Task Force; AILA’s EB-5 Committee;
        of  US territory even if Trump might   former chair of AILA’s Ethics Committee; special counsel on immigration matters to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee,
        like to imagine so!               Appellate Division, First Department, New York; member of the ABA Commission on Immigration; board member of Volunteers
            In  the  meantime,  the  executive   for Legal Services and board member of New York Immigration Coalition.  Mr. Mehta is the former chair of the Board of Trustees
        order  creates  much  ambiguity  and   of the American Immigration Council and former chair of the Committee on Immigration and Nationality Law of the New York
        poses  severe  consequences  for  indi-
        viduals who otherwise would have   City Bar Association. He is a frequent speaker and writer on various immigration-related issues, including on ethics, and is also an
        been  U.S.  citizens.  The  executive   adjunct professor of law at Brooklyn Law School, where he teaches a course entitled Immigration and Work.  Mr. Mehta received
        order applies not only to children of   the AILA 2018 Edith Lowenstein Memorial Award for advancing the practice of immigration law and the AILA 2011 Michael
        two undocumented parents, but also   Maggio Memorial Award for his outstanding efforts in providing pro bono representation in the immigration field. He has also
        to the U.S. born children of parents  received two AILA Presidential Commendations in 2010 and 2016.  Mr. Mehta is ranked among the most highly regarded lawyers
        who hold a valid nonimmigrant sta-  in North America by Who’s Who Legal – Corporate Immigration Law 2019 and is also ranked in Chambers USA and Chambers
        tus, such as H-1B and H-4. How will a  Global 2019 in immigration law, among other rankings.


                                                               www.TheIndianEYE.com
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38