Page 12 - The Indian EYE 090525
P. 12

OPINION                                                          SEPTEMBER 05, 2025        |  The Indian Eye 12

          The Real Game Behind






         Pakistan’s Nuclear Ploy









         Following the Pahalgam massacre in April and India’s firm resolve to bring the perpetrators and their
           supporters to justice—that saw action against groups operating from Pakistani territory—Pakistan

          responded predictably. It entered denial mode and resorted to its familiar tactic of nuclear blackmail



        DR RAJIV NAYAN

              akistan has once again at-
              tracted unfavorable attention
        Pconcerning nuclear matters.
        During a visit to the United States
        (US), its Chief of Army Staff, Munir
        Akram, issued a statement, including
        a threat to use nuclear weapons reck-
        lessly to target not only India but also
        half of the world. This provocative
        declaration was ostensibly aimed at
        pressuring the international commu-
        nity and India to grant concessions to
        Pakistan regarding the Indus Water
        Treaty  (IWT).  What  is  the  signifi-
        cance of this statement? Does it rep-
        resent any new development?
            As the spokesperson of the
        Ministry of External Affairs (MEA)
        aptly stated: “Nuclear saber-rattling
        is Pakistan’s stock-in-trade.” The
        Pakistani leadership is known for
        occasionally making this kind of ir-
        responsible statement. So, to a large
        extent, there is nothing new about
        the posturing. The reason for making
        the statement (IWT), though, may
        have changed. In the past, such state-  Pakistan’s nuclear signaling succeeded in convincing a segment of the international community—particularly in the West—that its leadership,
        ments  were issued  by the Pakistani                        influenced by a jihadi mindset, might resort to nuclear use (File photo)
        government in response to India
        contemplating military action against
        Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, India   ister  and  President. As critics point   for no rhyme or reason. It thus re-  to bring the perpetrators and their
        getting clean exemptions in the Nu-  out, the US swears by democracy and   sorted to nuclear blackmail not only   supporters to justice—that saw action
        clear Suppliers Group (NSG), NSG   hugs authoritarians in practice. The   as a tactic but also as a strategy.  against groups operating from Paki-
        members  supporting  India’s  mem-  US  action  vis-à-vis  Munir  Akram   The Pakistani MFA statement,   stani territory—Pakistan responded
        bership, and the like.            aptly substantiates this.         meanwhile, notes that Pakistan    predictably. It entered denial mode
            Moreover, as the Indian govern-   Quite interestingly, the Ministry   stands against nuclear blackmail and   and resorted to its familiar tactic of
        ment has highlighted and extensively   of Foreign Affairs (MFA) of Pakistan   states: “Pakistan remains firmly op-  nuclear blackmail. Is this outdated
        covered by the media, the statement   responded strongly to the statement   posed to the use or threat of use of   nuclear scaremongering strategy still
        was ‘made from the soil of a friendly   made by the MEA spokesperson. It   force [nuclear force].” Moreover, the   effective in 2025? Pakistan’s nuclear
        third country’, that is, the US. This   claimed that the spokesperson, the   statement adds: “We also note with   rhetoric offers little strategic, security,
        is rather unfortunate. It creates the   media, and the global strategic com-  concern a pointless reference to the   or diplomatic benefit. This prompts a
        impression that the statement was   munity’s reaction was based on dis-  third  countries…”  Given that  Paki-  key question: Why is that the case?
        aided and abetted by the US estab-  torted facts and ‘twisting statements   stan never hesitated to involve a third   Pakistan’s First Use nuclear doc-
        lishment,  which  has  been  engaging   out of context’. The MFA spokes-  party in a bilateral or Pakistan-in-  trine inherently creates a strategic di-
        the army chief while ignoring the   person seemingly distanced Pakistan   duced dispute, these statements by   lemma—when should it use nuclear
        Pakistani political leadership. The   from destroying India and the world.   the MFA look odd.        weapons? To act decisively, a thresh-
        Trump Administration is completely   In the past, the country frequently   Following the Pahalgam massa-  old or red line, crossing which would
        overlooking Pakistan’s Prime Min-  threatened to use nuclear weapons   cre in April and India’s firm resolve   Continued on next page... >>


                                                               www.TheIndianEYE.com
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17