Page 28 - The Indian EYE 122625

BUSINESS & TRADE DECEMBER 26, 2025 | The Indian Eye 28

IndiGo Probe Deepens as Disruptions

Expose Fault Lines in India’s Aviation Giant

Regulatory scrutiny, political attacks and angry passengers converge as India’s largest
airline faces questions over crew planning, market power and operational discipline.

OUR BUREAU
New Delhi

ndia’s biggest airline is facing its toughest tur-
bulence in years. A Competition Commission
Iof India (CCI) inquiry into recent mass flight
disruptions at IndiGo has escalated what began as
an operational crisis into a full-blown test of gover-
nance, competition and accountability in the coun-
try’s aviation sector. For an airline that commands
nearly 70 per cent of the domestic market, the in-
vestigation has sharpened criticism that IndiGo’s
internal mismanagement has ripple effects far be-
yond its own balance sheet.
The CCI’s decision to take cognisance of
complaints against IndiGo follows widespread
cancellations, delays and rescheduling earlier this
month that left thousands of passengers stranded
across multiple routes. In a formal statement, the
watchdog said it would proceed under provisions
of the Competition Act, 2002, signalling that the
issue extends beyond consumer inconvenience to
potential concerns around market conduct.
Aviation expert Subhash Goyal welcomed the
move, arguing that aviation, like railways, is an es- Union Minister for Civil Aviation Kinjarapu Ram Mohan Naidu chairs a meeting with Indigo’s top management, including IndiGo
sential service whose disruption cannot be treated
lightly. He pointed to the failure to implement re- CEO Pieter Elbers, in New Delhi (@RamMNK X/ANI Photo)
vised crew rest and Flight Duty Time Limitation
(FDTL) norms as a key trigger behind the chaos, While regulators circled from the outside, In- sector.
calling the situation a breakdown of a national life- diGo’s leadership sought to calm nerves internally. The judiciary has also entered the picture. The
line. Goyal said faith now rests with regulators and CEO Pieter Elbers told employees that “the worst Delhi High Court recently disposed of a fresh pub-
courts to ensure no airline can “hold the public to is behind us”, announcing that operations had sta- lic interest litigation against IndiGo, noting that
ransom” in the future. bilised and the airline had restored its network to similar issues are already under consideration in a
At the heart of the controversy lies crew roster- around 2,200 flights a day. In a series of internal pending writ petition. While this offers procedural
ing and internal planning — issues that the govern- messages, Elbers praised staff for holding togeth- clarity, it also underscores that legal scrutiny of the
ment has squarely placed at IndiGo’s door. Civil er during what he described as an unprecedented airline is far from over.
Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu Kinjarapu storm and outlined three priorities going forward: For IndiGo, the investigation represents a rep-
told Parliament that the airline’s crisis was linked resilience, root-cause analysis and rebuilding. utational risk that extends beyond the immediate
to day-to-day operational decisions, not regulato- Yet the contrast between management reas- crisis. Over 19 years, the airline has built its brand
ry surprises. Revised FDTL norms were notified surance and external scrutiny remains stark. Elbers on reliability, discipline and scale, carrying more
in January 2024, giving airlines nearly two years has urged employees to avoid speculation, noting than 850 million passengers since inception. The
to prepare. Yet, when implementation tightened, that an external aviation expert appointed by the current episode threatens to puncture that narra-
IndiGo was hit by an acute shortage of pilots and board would conduct a comprehensive review. But tive, raising uncomfortable questions about wheth-
crew, triggering a cascading collapse of schedules for regulators and critics, the issue is no longer just er cost efficiency and rapid expansion came at the
from December 3 onwards. about fixing a glitch — it is about whether Indi- expense of resilience.
The fallout was immediate. Airports witnessed Go’s scale magnifies the cost of its mistakes. The CCI probe will now determine wheth-
overcrowding, delays stretched into hours, and air- That argument has found political backing. er the disruptions were merely the result of poor
fares on alternative carriers surged. The Civil Avi- Aam Aadmi Party MP Raghav Chadha has seized planning — or symptomatic of deeper issues tied
ation Ministry was forced to step in, capping fares, on the crisis to revive concerns over what he calls to market dominance and competition. Either way,
mandating refunds and rescheduling support, and a “duopoly” in Indian aviation. With Air India and the outcome is likely to shape not just IndiGo’s
issuing specific directions on baggage reconcilia- IndiGo dominating the market, Chadha alleged future, but the regulatory framework governing
tion and passenger handling. IndiGo has since es- that IndiGo’s sheer size gives it undue leverage India’s fast-growing aviation industry. For passen-
timated that compensation to affected customers over regulators. In blunt terms, he claimed such gers and policymakers alike, the message is clear:
could exceed Rs 500 crore — a rare admission of dominance creates “blackmailing power”, allow- when the country’s largest airline stumbles, the
the financial scale of the disruption. ing failures at one airline to destabilise the entire system cannot afford to look away.

www.TheIndianEYE.com