Page 43 - The Indian EYE 122520
P. 43

IMMIGRATIOn                                                           DECEMBER 25, 2020  |        The Indian Eye                          43



















                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       NOW







                                                                                                              IndiaLife TV Available











                                                                                                                on your SmartTV with Zingo TV App















        er guidance. Importantly,  Cir. 2000). In Defensor,  petitioners have success-          decisions have done, that  (1997). In its decision in
        the Ninth Circuit in Inno- the court held that the held  fully challenged USCIS’s  the OOH may not be used  Innova Solutions, the court
        va Solutions held that this  that the criteria in 8 CFR  denial of H-1B petitions  as  a  Holy  Grail  to  deny  acknowledges that Auer
                                                                                                Simply go to your App Store or Play Store
        same language from the  § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) are  on the grounds that the  H-1B petitions that are  deference  applies  only  to
        OOH does not contradict  merely necessary condi- position in question did  based on well-reasoned ar- genuinely ambiguous reg-
        the regulatory criteria at 8  tions, rather than necessary  not qualify as a specialty  guments by the petitioner  ulations, which 8 C.F.R.
        C.F.R. 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A),  and  sufficient  conditions,  occupation. See, e.g., Tay- and corroborated by sub- 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) is not.
        effectively undercutting the  to establish that a position  lor Made Software, Inc. v.  stantial evidence, including  The court’s decision  re-
        USCIS’ rationale for issu- is a specialty occupation, a  Cissna, Civil Action No.  expert opinions.                  minds the USCIS that
        ing the 2017 memorandum. decision the USCIS often  2019-0202 (D.D.C.  2020);            From SmartTV  Download ZingoTV App
                                                                                                    Finally, one cannot  Auer deference is not a
            Additionally,   Innova cites in H-1B RFEs. Id.  Relx, Inc. v. Baran, 397 F.  overstate the growing im- broad license to deny mer-
        Solutions represents the  Similarly, in Royal Siam  Supp. 3d 41 (D.D.C. 2019);  portance of Kisor v. Wilk- itorious H-1B petitions.
        first recent reported circuit  Corp. v. Chertoff, the First  Next Generation Technol-   ie in limiting the USCIS’s
        court decision in which the  Circuit ruled in favor of  ogy v. Johnson, 15 cv 5663  ability to exercise broad           *Kaitlyn Box graduated
        court has ruled in favor of  USCIS’s position that a  (S.D.N.Y. 2017). In Innova  discretion in interpreting  with  a  JD  from  Penn  State
                                                                                                                             Law in 2020, and works as a
        the H-1B petitioner. Other  position  which requires  a  Solutions, the Ninth Cir-      Login|Register with your eMail then
                                                                                                its own regulations un-
        landmark circuit court cas- degree in a specific special- cuit reminds the USCIS, as  der Auer precedent. Auer  Law Clerk at Cyrus D. Mehta
        es have historically favored  ty related to the duties and  the numerous lower court  v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452  & Partners PLLC.
        the USCIS. In Defensor v.  responsibilities of the job     _________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                Start Watching IndiaLife TV  24 Hours LIVE
        Meissner, for example, the  should  be  accorded  more     Cyrus D. Mehta, a graduate of Cambridge University and Columbia Law School, is the Managing Partner
        Fifth Circuit ruled against  weight than a generic de-     of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC in New York City. Mr. Mehta is a member of AILA’s Administra-
        a  medical  staffing  agency  gree requirement. Royal  tive Litigation Task Force; AILA’s EB-5 Committee; former chair of AILA’s Ethics Committee; special
        that  had  filed  H-1B  pe-  Siam Corp v. Chertoff, 484  counsel on immigration matters to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Appellate Division, First
        titions on behalf of the  F.3d 139 (First Cir. 2007).  Department, New York; member of the ABA Commission on Immigration; board member of Volunteers
        nurses it employed on the  Innova Solutions is thus a      for Legal Services and board member of New York Immigration Coalition.  Mr. Mehta is the former chair
        grounds that the end hos- unique and welcome victo-        of the Board of Trustees of the American Immigration Council and former chair of the Committee on
        pital where the nurses were  ry for H-1B petitioners in    Immigration and Nationality Law of the New York City Bar Association. He is a frequent speaker and
                                                     You can click   www.indialife.tv
        placed was really the super- the circuit courts.           writer on various immigration-related issues, including on ethics, and is also an adjunct professor of law
        vising entity, and reasoning     The Ninth Circuit’s       at Brooklyn Law School, where he teaches a course entitled Immigration and Work.  Mr. Mehta received
                                                                   the AILA 2018 Edith Lowenstein Memorial Award for advancing the practice of immigration law and
        that no evidence suggested  decision is in line with a     the AILA 2011 Michael Maggio Memorial Award for his outstanding efforts in providing pro bono repre-
        these hospitals required  number  of  recent  deci-        sentation in the immigration field. He has also received two AILA Presidential Commendations in 2010
                                                     on your browser and watch IndiaLife TV 24 Hours
        the nurses to possess bach- sions in lower courts in  and 2016.  Mr. Mehta is ranked among the most highly regarded lawyers in North America by Who’s
        elor’s degrees.  Defensor  which, in contrast to most  Who Legal – Corporate Immigration Law 2019 and is also ranked in Chambers USA and Chambers
        v. Meissner, 201 F.3d (5th  circuit court cases, H-1B      Global 2019 in immigration law, among other rankings.


                                                               www.TheIndianEYE .us



                                                                                                                                                                                Also download ZingoTV





                                                                                                                                                                                for any of your Mobile Device





                                                                                                                                                                                or any Smart Device





                                                                                                                                                                                Start Watching IndiaLife TV




                                                                                                                                                                                24 Hours LIVE                                                                                                                             IndiaLife TV



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        The Heartbeat of





                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Indians in






                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                North America






                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               and Worldwide










                                                                                                                                            Advertise with IndiaLife TV







                                                                                      Call: 1-917-662-1122   eMail: [email protected]
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48