Page 12 - The Indian EYE 092223
P. 12

OPINION                                                           SEPTEMBER 22, 2023  |      The Indian Eye 12



        critical energy facilities. Although
        the  declaration has not mentioned
        Zaporizhzhia, Chornobyl and any
        other Ukrainian nuclear complex, any
        nuclear energy complex is considered
        a critical energy facility. Both state
        and non-state actors may sabotage a
        nuclear  energy  complex.  For  years,
        the nuclear summit process and its
        follow-up  activities  have  placed  the
        limelight on nuclear terrorism. The
        international community is active in
        meeting the challenge not only in the
        nuclear summit process but also in
        other international forums. The G-20
        has also become an important forum
        to address the challenge of nuclear
        terrorism.
            The Financial Action Task Force
        (FATF) has emerged as an important
        global watchdog for combating mon-
        ey  laundering  and  the  financing  of
        terrorism. It establishes global guide-
        lines designed to thwart these unlaw-
        ful actions and the detrimental con-
        sequences they inflict on society. The
        proliferation  financing  for  Weapons
        of Mass Destruction, including nucle-
        ar weapons, has been one of the sub-  Prime Minister Narendra Modi, United Kingdom PM Rishi Sunak, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva and other dignitaries attend
        jects of the FATF. It has been quite
        active  on  the  issue.  The  G-20  has                 Session 3 of the G20 Leaders’ Summit at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi (ANI)
        been recognizing the role of FATF in
        many of its previous meetings.    schemes, which would violate perti-   This  begs  the  question:  as   the weakening of the overwhelming
                                          nent obligations. Additionally, it will   Ukraine does not possess nuclear   global support it has for its territorial
          The Delhi Leaders’ Declaration also   guarantee that countries and private   weapons, doesn’t the statement apply   integrity and sovereignty. India and
                    lays down:
                We reiterate the importance of   sector entities allocate resources ap-  only to Russia if the war in Ukraine   many other countries also face nucle-
        countries developing and implement-  propriately, aligning with the level   is taken as a context? At present, it   ar threats and blackmail from those
                                          of risks associated with proliferation
                                                                                                              nuclear countries that do not ascribe
                                                                            may appear so. However, the future
        ing effective regulatory and super-  financing.                     of war is unpredictable. The Russian   to the no-first-use policy.
        visory frameworks to mitigate risks   The Russia–Ukraine War seems   threat of nuclear weapons use kept   Thus, the comprehensive and
        associated with virtual assets in line   to have shadowed the Delhi sum-  happening in the past. But fortunate-  inclusive nature of the G-20 and its
        with FATF Standards, especially for   mit and the Declaration, too. After   ly, notwithstanding the regular sabre   Leaders’ Declaration may be wit-
        terrorism financing, money launder-  mentioning  the  discussions  in  Bali   rattling, the taboo on nuclear use has   nessed in different issue areas which
        ing, and proliferation financing risks.   on the war in Ukraine, the Leaders’   remained intact. And the Russian ut-  have been covered during the Delhi
        In this regard, we support the FATF’s   Declaration mentions the national   terances have basically been aimed   meeting. The nuclear issue has all the
        initiative to accelerate the global im-  positions  taken on the  UN resolu-  at extracting concessions in the con-  dimensions—economic, energy tran-
        plementation of its standards, includ-  tions passed on the War in Ukraine.   flict.  A careful reading of the Rus-  sitions, security and the combination
        ing the ‘travel rule’, and its work on   The same paragraph also cites the   sian leadership of the use may indi-  of all. A consensus document may
        risks of emerging technologies and   UN  Charter,  especially  its  principle   cate that it always has caveats that are   have some words desired by an indi-
        innovations, including decentralized   ‘the use or threat of use of force for   downplayed or concealed by a section   vidual country missing but overall, it
        finance  (DeFi)  arrangements  and   territorial acquisition against the ter-  of the media.          is a balanced document on the nucle-
        peer-to-peer transactions.        ritorial integrity and sovereignty or   However, those backing Ukraine   ar issues it has sought to touch upon
            The G-20 underlines the signifi-
        cance of determining and evaluating   political independence of any state.’   occasionally have also used the Rus-  or cover for various objectives.
                                              The last line of the paragraph
                                                                            sian nuclear threat to mobilize glob-
        the potential risks associated with   has a statement on the nuclear threat.   al public opinion. As the situation is   Dr Rajiv Nayan is Senior Research
        potential violations, lack of enforce-  “The use or threat of use of nuclear   escalating and Ukraine is increasingly   Associate at the Manohar Parrikar
        ment, or avoidance of specific finan-  weapons is inadmissible.”   This is a   getting more sophisticated weapons,   Institute for Defense Studies and Analy-
        cial sanctions tied to proliferation   consensus line upon which the entire   the G-20 has taken the right step in   ses, New Delhi
        financing,  and  implementation  of   summit has agreed upon. This is fu-  making the statement general in na-
        suitable measures to address these   turistic and  universalistic  in  nature.   ture. It needs to be applied to all. Even   Views expressed are of the author and
        risks in proportion to their severity.   Since it is part of the paragraph on   if the immediate signaling is for Rus-  do not necessarily reflect the views of
        This approach will serve to inform   the War in Ukraine, it clearly means   sia, in the future, the statement should   the Manohar Parrikar IDSA or of the
        both private sector entities and their   that no side will resort to the use or   remain a dominant global norm.  Government of India.
        regulatory authorities about the in-  threat  of  use  of  nuclear  weapons.   An  overemphasis  on  the  The full version of this article first
        herent  risks  within  their  industries   However, a Ukrainian official wanted   Ukrainian narrative may lead to   appeared in the Comments section of
        and professions, preventing inad-  the line to be read as: “On war against   the impression that Europe is still   the website (www.idsa.in) of Manohar
        vertent support or involvement in   Ukraine, Russia’s use or threat of use   self-centered  and  Ukraine  does  not   Parrikar Institute for Defense Studies
        proliferation  financing  networks  or
                                          of nuclear weapons is inadmissible.”  think beyond itself. This may lead to   and Analyses, New Delhi on September
                                                                                                                          15, 2023
                                                               www.TheIndianEYE.com
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17