Page 12 - The Indian EYE 051223
P. 12

OPINION                                                                   MAY 12, 2023  |    The Indian Eye 12



        aspirations. This may include, but                                                                    an issue of syntactical nuance but had
        is  not  defined  by,  the  willingness  to                                                           practical implications. As each set of
        condone, support, facilitate or use vi-                                                               counter-radicalization initiatives or
        olence to further political, ideological,                                                             steps addressed a particular concern,
        religious or other goals.                                                                             used a unique approach, and had dif-
            As the above definition may sug-
        gest, radicalization is today linked to                                                               ferent standards of measurement that
                                                                                                              are applicable in different stages of
        extremism, which might suggest that                                                                   the lactic cycle of radicalization—with
        radicalism and extremism are synon-                                                                   characteristic behavior, tactics, tech-
        ymous and interchangeable. While in                                                                   niques, and procedures (TTPs)—they
        most cases this might be true, it is also                                                             could not be lumped under one over-
        a fact that many academicians and ex-                                                                 arching category.
        perts fail to make any differentiation                                                                    On the other hand, ‘counter-rad-
        which is, in reality, quite subtle.                                                                   icalization programmes’ target those
            However, it would be necessary
        first to understand the meaning of the                                                                radicalized elements that may have
                                                                                                              not  yet  joined  forces  of  violent  ex-
        term ‘political extremism’. According                                                                 tremism or terrorism and can be res-
        to several security experts, political                                                                cued before they attempt the danger-
        extremists refer to people who are                                                                    ous transition. The measures suited to
        quite dogmatic, intolerant, and hos-                                                                  counter-terrorism operations include
        tile towards not only all competing                                                                   disengagement, rehabilitation and
        political ideologies and philosophies   Violent extremism also covers hate crimes ranging from hate speeches, direct physical   reintegration programmes. The third
        but even towards their proponents.                                                                    category pertains to ‘de-radicalization
        While radical actors might be funda-     assault, vandalizing and desecrating sacred and revered sites (File photo)  programmes’, devised for those indi-
        mentally antithetical towards the ex-                                                                 viduals who may have already aided,
        isting socio-political order, they may   across the globe that struggle with   genocide and ethnic cleansing in some   abetted, or committed acts of violent
        or may not view politics as a zero-sum   different kinds of subjects that re-  instances.             extremism. Thus, these measures cov-
        game. Furthermore, they may not be   quire more specialized attention.  Terrorism is just one of the man-  er post-surrender and post-detention
        vehemently opposed to the existence   There are also two other terms—  ifestations of violent extremism. Un-  programmes.
        of their rivals—be they, people of for-  violent extremism and terrorism—that   fortunately, as is well-known, there is   However, all these three pro-
        eign origin, belonging to a different   are the subject of confusion and debate   also a lack of international consensus   grammes still generically fall under
        religion or supporters of a different   among security experts. Thus, violent   on  the  definition  of  terrorism.    Ac-  ‘counter-radicalization’. Many of these
        political ideology, etc.          extremism is a broader term that cov-  cording to Alec Schmid, terrorism can   behavior  modification  programmes
            Thus, Gandhi was a radical leader   ers terrorism, along with hate crimes   be viewed as a tactic and a doctrine.
        in that he opposed the Western impe-  and  fomenting  communal  clashes.  As a tactic, terrorism involves indis-  under the categories mentioned above
                                                                                                              cover ideological or religious counsel-
        rial rule of his time and practiced his   According to the Federal Bureau   criminately using direct violent action   ling, vocational education, recreation-
        version of rural socialism as opposed   of Investigation (FBI) of the United   against non-combatants and civilians.   al and psychological rehabilitation,
        to capitalist colonialism. Still, he was   States, violent extremism refers to the   As a doctrine, terrorism involves the   inter-religious or inter-communal
        not an extremist as he never hated or   “encouraging, condoning, justifying,   strategic belief that political goals can   discourse programmes, post-release
        despised the British personally and   or supporting the commission of a   be achieved by coercing a government   surveillance, and care, as well as the
        used non-violence even as his means   violent act to achieve political, ideo-  or even the international community   involvement of family members and
        of resisting colonial excesses. Thus,   logical, religious, social, or economic   through terrorist actions.  civil society to foster rehabilitation.
        radicals may not be as harsh in their   goals”. This is the broadest description   According to the 2011 revised aca-  Thus,  we  find  greater  clarity
        actions as extremists are.        of socially and politically disruptive ac-  demic consensus definition, Terrorism   emerging over previously contentious
            Whereas  non-extremist radicals   tivities, including terrorist attacks.  refers, on the one hand, to a doctrine
        like Gandhi, Martin Luther, and       Similarly, US Agency for Inter-  about the presumed effectiveness of   issues related to violent extremism
                                                                                                              and terrorism. With more academic
        Nelson Mandela can exist, who bring   national Development (USAID) de-  a special form or tactic of fear-gener-  consensus and unanimity of views at
        about a more democratic and egali-  fines violent extremist activities as the   ating, coercive political violence and,   the international levels, it is hoped
        tarian order, extremist radicals tend   “advocating, engaging in, preparing,   on the other hand, to a conspiratorial   that various counter-terrorism and
        to favor a more intolerant,  militant,   or otherwise supporting ideologically   practice of calculated, demonstrative,   counter-radicalization  programmes
        and authoritarian dispensation. Ex-  motivated or justified violence to fur-  direct violent action without legal or   would become more effective in fight-
        perts like Peter Neumann make the   ther social, economic or political ob-  moral restraints, targeting mainly civil-  ing a significant threat to global securi-
        distinction between cognitive radical-  jectives”.                  ians and non-combatants, performed   ty and the socio-political order.
        ization  (people  who  hold extremist   Violent  extremism  also  covers   for its propagandistic and psycholog-
        beliefs) as against   behavioral radical-  hate crimes ranging from hate speech-  ical effects on various audiences and   Dr. Adil Rasheed is Research Fellow at
        ization (people who take non-violent   es, direct physical assault, vandalizing   conflict parties.    the Manohar Parrikar Institute for De-
        and violent action in support of radi-  and desecrating sacred and revered   Ironically, there has not just   fense Studies and Analyses, New Delhi.
        cal socio-political change).      sites, property damage, lynching, ver-  been  confusion  over  definitions  of   Views expressed are of the author and
            Although the meaning of radi-  bal and physical abuse, social and/or   terrorism, radicalization, and violent
                                                                                                                do not necessarily reflect the views of
        calism and extremism remains vague   online stalking, sticking of offensive   extremism but even counter-radical-  the Manohar Parrikar IDSA or of the
        in  the  absence  of  legal  definitions,   posters  and  graffiti,  use  of  weapons.   ization programmes launched by se-  Government of India.
        many strategic experts like Astrid   Hate can be directed against members   curity agencies worldwide. The meth-
        Bötticher have sought to build ac-  of a particular section of society based   odologies and terminologies used in   This is an abridged version
        ademic consensus over these ter-  on race, ethnicity, language, religion,   counter-radicalization  programmes  of the article which first appeared in the
        minologies to bring clarity to many   nationality, sexual orientation, gender,   were developed separately in differ-  Comments section of the website (www.
        government-run Countering Violent   disability, wealth, etc. Violent extrem-  ent countries and were subject to con-  idsa.in) of Manohar Parrikar Institute
        Extremism and Terrorism (CVET)    ism  also covers sectarian and ethnic   stant revision. This, in turn, caused   for Defense Studies and Analyses, New
        programmes and De-radicalization   clashes that may rise to the level of   confusion as the matter was not just   Delhi on May 2, 2023


                                                               www.TheIndianEYE.com
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17