Page 48 - The Indian EYE 042321
P. 48

ImmIGRATION                                                                  APRIL 23, 2021  |    The Indian Eye                          48





             coPing witH delays facing H-4 and l-2 sPouses


                    WHen THey Have a pending


          adjusTmenT applicaTiOn – parT 2





        cyrus d. meHTa               extension and Advance  elling abroad poses a  ing the AOS when both  cessing.
        isaBel rajaBzadeH*           Parole (AP) processing.  conundrum. In order to  the H-1B and AOS are                     does an l-2 spouse
        A       lthough H-4 and      threat to abandonment  is still processing, one                There  is an  inherent       Out of the many
                                     This blog tackles the  preserve the AOS that  pending.
                                                                                                                                  need an ead?
                L-2
                        extensions
                                     of AOS when traveling  needs to have either AP  vagueness as to whether
                continue to be
        delayed since our  last      internationally while AP  or valid H-4/L-2 status  the Cronin memo ap- downfalls of the H-4/L-2
                                     and H-4/L-2 are process- before leaving. Accord- plies to derivatives since  processing delays, one
        blog    “Coping  with  De-   ing. We also discuss the  ingly, 8 CFR 245.2(a)(4) H-4s and L-2s are not  of  the  most  significant
        lays Facing H-4 and L-2      complex interplay with  (ii)(B)-(C) outlines two  mentioned in the memo  is  the  Employment  Au-
        Spouses”,  we highlight      employment authoriza- distinct pathways. Under  in respect to this issue.  thorization                  Document
        another issue,  which        tion for H-4/L-2 spouses  (B), it allows those with  One may however argue,             (EAD) processing gaps
        adds further hardship        who have pending AOS  approved AP to leave  through anecdotal expe- afflicting families around
        for H-4 and L-2 spouses      applications.                 the country and then  rience, that the Cronin  the nation. At large, this
        faced with unjust pro-                                     subsequently return in  Memo should apply to  issue has subjected many
        cessing delays. In Octo-        Preserving H-4 and         AP  without  abandoning  H-4s and L-2s and there- spouses and their fami-
        ber 2020, the EB-3 Dates       l-2 status when an          their AOS, absent any  fore, the H-4/L-2 should  lies to financial struggle,
        for Filing in the Visa            aos is Pending           specific  situations  out- be able to enter the Unit- and it remains a leading
        Bulletin advanced sig-           Since the H-1B and  lined in the regulation.  ed States in AP and be  issue that the USCIS and
        nificantly, which allowed    L visas allow for dual  Under (C), the same is  able to switch to H-4/L-2  the Biden administra-
        many born in India to        intent, it is possible to  true for those who leave  status once the H-4/L-2  tion must immediately
        file  Form  I-485,  Adjust-  maintain H or L non- in H-4/L-2 status and re- extension is approved.                   resolve. The hardship
        ment of Status (AOS)         immigrant status while  turn in H-4/L-2.                                                is compounded by the
        applications. The surge      an AOS application for           In 2000, the Cronin  Preserving adjustment  fact that there are de-
        in  AOS  cases,  coupled     permanent residence has  Memo was published and                of status when           lays in the processing of
        with the H-4/L-2 pro-        been filed.                   clarified that although an  advanced Parole and  the EAD under both the
        cessing delays, have left        Due to the delays  H-1B or L is considered                 H-4 are Pending          AOS and the H-4/L-2.
        many with the inability      in the processing of  to be paroled after enter-               What happens when  Nonetheless, there  may
        to travel abroad as they     H-4/L-2 extensions and  ing the United States via  an H-4 has a pending  be an arguable legal basis
        await both their H-4/L-2     requests for EAD, trav- AP, he/she is still able to  AOS  and has  not  re- for an L-2 spouse to en-
                                                                   apply for an extension of  ceived AP or H-4 ap- gage in employment with-
                                                                   H-1B or L if there was a  proval but wants to travel  out obtaining an EAD.
                                                                   valid and approved peti- based on an emergency?               In the Matter of Do
                                                                   tion. Upon the granting  This issue is two-fold and  Kyung Lee, the Board
                                                                   of the H-1B or L exten- is  specifically  applica- of Immigration Appeals
                                                                   sion, the grant of parole  ble to those whose prior  (BIA) held that employ-
                                                                   would be terminated,  H-4/L-2 statuses have  ment authorization is in-
                                                                   and the H-1B applicant  expired and have timely  cident to E-2 status. INA
                                                                   would then be admitted  filed their extensions but  214(e)(6) explicitly states
                                                                   into the relevant H-1B  still await processing. As  that an E-2 spouse shall
                                                                   status. Although the  mentioned before in our  be authorized to engage
                                                                   Cronin Memo contem- prior blog, although the  in  employment.   In  this
                                                                   plates one who is already  H-4 can get a visa stamp  unpublished  decision,
                                                                   in H-1B and L status be- at a US consulate, the  the  BIA reasoned  that
                                                                   fore traveling abroad and  AOS may be deemed  the regulation at 8 CFR
                                                                   being paroled via AP, it  abandoned if the H-4 left  274a.12(c)(2) only spec-
                                                                   could also apply to one  the US without H-4 sta- ified that the dependent
                                                                   who  has  a  pending  ex- tus or AP.                      spouse  and  child  of  an
                                                                   tension of  H-1B or L-1          In this scenario, the  E-1 visa holder must ap-
                                                                   status application and  only recourse for the H-4  ply for work authoriza-
                      m of                                         who traveled abroad un- is to apply for an emer- tion, but the same regu-
           CYRUS D. MEHTA & PARTNERS PLLC                          der AP and was paroled  gency AP by calling the  lation did not specifically
                                                                   into the US. Likewise,  USCIS 800 number to  state that the spouse of
                                                                                              upon the approval of the  schedule an appoint- an E-2 must do the

                                                                   H-1B or L-1 request, the  ment with the local US- same. The Court held
              	                                 
                            parole would be termi- CIS  office,  however,  it  that since INA 214(e)
                                                    
             ­
                €   
              ‚                                                     nated, and the beneficia- is  not  definite  that  one  (6)  specifically  autho-
                                                                   ry would be admitted in  will be able to connect to  rized the E-2 spouse to
                                                                   H-1B or L status. This al- a  live-person, let  alone  engage in employment,
                                                                   lows the H-1B beneficia- convince the USCIS that  the  E-2  spouse’s  failure

          2              6th Floor                                 ry to travel abroad while  the  emergency  qualifies  to apply for an EAD did
           
     
        	
     
         
                 simultaneously preserv- for expeditious AP pro- not result in a violation

                                                               www.TheIndianEYE .com
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53