Page 6 - The Indian EYE 041726

EYE ON INDIA APRIL 17, 2026 | The Indian Eye 6

Kejriwal Returns to Centre

Stage as Courtroom Battles

and Political Attacks Converge

From arguing his own case to targeting institutions, AAP chief reasserts political relevance amid legal scrutiny.

OUR BUREAU now-scrapped Delhi Excise Policy
2021-22 — has already drawn in sev-
NEW DELHI
eral leaders of the Aam Aadmi Par-
t a time when legal challenges ty (AAP), including former Deputy
and political confrontations Chief Minister Manish Sisodia. The
Aare intensifying, Arvind Kejri- stakes, therefore, extend beyond in-
wal has thrust himself back into the dividual accountability to the credi-
national spotlight, blending court- bility of the party itself.
room strategy with sharp political The CBI has underscored this by
messaging to reclaim centre stage in emphasising the need for expeditious
India’s political discourse. handling of cases involving elected
The immediate trigger has been representatives, citing the impor-
the high-profile proceedings in the tance of maintaining public confi-
Delhi excise policy case, where Ke- dence in democratic institutions. It
jriwal has taken the unusual step of argued that interim observations by
appearing in person before the Delhi courts are tentative and cannot be
High Court to argue a plea seeking construed as bias, rejecting the basis
recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta of the recusal plea.
Sharma. The move has not only ele- Even as the legal arguments un-
vated the legal battle into a political fold, the political narrative contin-
spectacle but also signalled a shift ues to evolve. By appearing in court
in Kejriwal’s approach — from de- AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal speaks to the media regarding the ongoing excise policy case in and simultaneously launching pub-
fensive positioning to direct engage- New Delhi (ANI Video Grab) lic critiques, Kejriwal is effectively
ment. bridging two arenas — law and poli-
In court, Kejriwal maintained thus become a key arena where Ke- seen as an attempt to politicise judi- tics — to sustain visibility. The strat-
that he had followed due procedure jriwal is reasserting his presence. cial proceedings. egy ensures that the case remains
in filing the recusal application, even By directly engaging with the legal Yet, politically, the optics work in not just a legal matter but a subject
as he pointed out “procedural limita- process — rather than relying solely Kejriwal’s favour. In an environment of public debate.
tions for litigants appearing in person on counsel — he has transformed a where legal battles often unfold be- There is also a tactical dimension
in e-filing.” His decision to argue the procedural dispute into a public nar- hind closed doors, his visible partic- to this approach. The High Court has
matter himself has drawn attention, rative about fairness, process and in- ipation creates a perception of con- allowed other parties to file similar
reinforcing an image of personal stitutional accountability. frontation with powerful institutions recusal pleas and directed the CBI
stake and direct accountability in a — a narrative that has historically to respond within a short timeline,
case that has significant political im- This is not without risk. Solicitor resonated with his political base. ensuring that the issue remains in ac-
plications. Parallel to the courtroom strate- tive consideration. Meanwhile, earli-
However, the response from in- General Tushar Mehta, appear- gy, Kejriwal has sharpened his polit- er attempts to transfer the case were
vestigators has been equally forceful. ing for the CBI, sharply criti- ical messaging. In a strongly worded declined, with the Chief Justice not-
The Central Bureau of Investigation cised the move, stating that the public statement, he targeted the ing that any decision on recusal rests
(CBI) has opposed the plea, calling plea was “frivolous” and based Election Commission of India (ECI), with the concerned judge. This keeps
it “frivolous, vexatious and base- suggesting that there was no longer the focus squarely on the ongoing
less” and warning that such attempts on vexatious allegations. He any need to state that the poll body proceedings — and by extension, on
could undermine the dignity of the cautioned that the courtroom was “working under the BJP.” “This Kejriwal himself.
judiciary. It argued that the appli- is “not a forum for theatrics,” is now out in the open and extremely In effect, what might have re-
cation was based on “conjectures unfortunate,” he said, while also cau- mained a technical legal dispute has
and surmises” and did not meet the adding that if Kejriwal wished to tioning against publicly tarnishing been amplified into a high-visibility
threshold required to question judi- argue in person, he must first the reputation of such an institution. confrontation. The combination of
cial impartiality, adding that enter- discharge his counsel. The convergence of legal and personal courtroom advocacy, in-
taining such pleas could encourage political fronts is central to under- stitutional critique and sustained
“bench hunting” and erode judicial standing Kejriwal’s renewed visi- political messaging has brought
independence. Such remarks reflect the institu- bility. The excise policy case — in- Kejriwal back into the limelight at
The courtroom exchanges have tional pushback against what is being volving alleged irregularities in the a critical juncture.

www.TheIndianEYE.com