Page 45 - The Indian EYE 030124
P. 45

IMMIGRATION                                                           MARCH 01, 2024       |  The Indian Eye 45




















                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 NOW






                                                                                                    IndiaLife TV Available









                                                                                                     on your SmartTV with Zingo TV App














        counting of both the principal and  employment  authorization  benefits,  vast economic and political signif-  identify clear congressional authority
                                                                                        Simply go to your App Store or Play Store
        derivative  beneficiaries  in  the  em-  such as with the Deferred Action for  icance. The dissent in Washington  disapproving what the agency propos-
        ployment-based fifth preference. In-  Childhood Arrivals program or with  Alliance  of  Technology  Workers  v.  es to do, the court should uphold the
        deed, the Court in Wang v. Blinken  F-1 optional practical training.”  the U.S. Department of Homeland  agency action if it is reasonable.  The
        also rejected the government’s argu-  At present, courts also rely on  Security (“Washtech v. DHS”), for  Supreme Court’s decisions in Relent-
        ment that it was entitled to Chevron  the “major questions” doctrine in  example, argued that the issue of  less and Loper Bright could help to
        deference in interpreting INA 203(d)  West Virginia v. EPA, 142 S. Ct. 2587  whether DHS’ 2016  OPT  Rule  ex-  resolve this discrepancy. If Chevron
                                                                                        From SmartTV  Download ZingoTV App
        by counting derivatives as INA 203(d)  (2022) to side step Chevron defer-  ceeds its statutory authority was a  deference is eliminated, courts need
        was not ambiguous in the first place.  ence even if a statute is ambiguous.  “major question”. Similarly, in a foot-  not even need to go into the “major
            Two upcoming Supreme Court  Here the Supreme Court held that “in  note, the court in Texas v. USA cited  questions” doctrine.
        cases –  Relentless, Inc. v. Depart-  certain extraordinary cases” where it  West Virginia v. EPA in holding that   Matter  of  Aguilar  Hernandez
        ment of Commerce and Loper Bright  is unclear whether an agency action  DHS had no Congressional authority  gives  us  a  taste  of  how  courts  will
        Enterprises v. Raimondo –  may nar-  was  authorized  by  Congress,  “given  to implement the DACA program.  interpret INA provisions and regu-
                                                                                        Login|Register with your eMail then
        row Chevron or even eviscerate it  both separation of powers principles  The standard articulated in West  lations in a post Chevron world al-
        altogether.  If  the  Supreme  Court’s  and a practical understanding of leg-  Virginia v. EPA requires agencies to  though it remains to be seen wheth-
        holdings in Relentless and Loper  islative intent, the agency must point  assert clear Congressional authoriza-  er  the end result  will  always  be
        Bright deprive agencies of the ability  to ‘clear congressional authorization’  tion when implementing a new policy  beneficial.
        to interpret ambiguous statutes with-  for the authority it claims”.  Such ex-  of major significance, while Chevron
                                                                                        Start Watching IndiaLife TV  24 Hours LIVE
        out explicit Congressional authoriza-  traordinary cases where the “major  imposes an almost opposite standard   *Kaitlyn Box is a Senior Associate at
        tion, it may result in both good and  questions” doctrine is invoked have  by saying that if the court cannot   Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC.
        bad outcomes in the immigration   _________________________________________________________________________________________________________
        context. According to the Think Im-  Cyrus D. Mehta, a graduate of Cambridge University and Columbia Law School, is the Managing Partner of Cyrus D. Mehta &
        migration Blog: “For example, in   Partners PLLC in New York City. Mr. Mehta is a member of AILA’s Administrative Litigation Task Force; AILA’s EB-5 Com-
        removal cases, Chevron deference   mittee; former chair of AILA’s Ethics Committee; special counsel on immigration matters to the Departmental Disciplinary
        hurts those seeking review of immi-  Committee, Appellate Division, First Department, New York; member of the ABA Commission on Immigration; board member of
        gration judge or Board of Immigra-  Volunteers for Legal Services and board member of New York Immigration Coalition.  Mr. Mehta is the former chair of the Board
                                                    You can click   www.indialife.tv
                                          of Trustees of the American Immigration Council and former chair of the Committee on Immigration and Nationality Law of the
        tion Appeals decisions. It can also   New York City Bar Association. He is a frequent speaker and writer on various immigration-related issues, including on ethics, and
        hurt employers seeking to obtain a   is also an adjunct professor of law at Brooklyn Law School, where he teaches a course entitled Immigration and Work.  Mr. Mehta
        favorable interpretation of a statute   received the AILA 2018 Edith Lowenstein Memorial Award for advancing the practice of immigration law and the AILA 2011
        granting H-1B or L visa classification   Michael Maggio Memorial Award for his outstanding efforts in providing pro bono representation in the immigration field. He has
        to  a  noncitizen  worker.      However,   also received two AILA Presidential Commendations in 2010 and 2016.  Mr. Mehta is ranked among the most highly regarded
                                                    on your browser and watch IndiaLife TV 24 Hours
        Chevron deference can help when   lawyers in North America by Who’s Who Legal – Corporate Immigration Law 2019 and is also ranked in Chambers USA and
        the immigration agency seeks to give   Chambers Global 2019 in immigration law, among other rankings.


                                                               www.TheIndianEYE.com


                                                                                                                                                            Also download ZingoTV




                                                                                                                                                            for any of your Mobile Device



                                                                                                                                                            or any Smart Device




                                                                                                                                                            Start Watching IndiaLife TV




                                                                                                                                                            24 Hours LIVE                                                                                                         IndiaLife TV


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  The Heartbeat of




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Indians in





                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         North America





                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        and Worldwide








                                                                                                                              Advertise with IndiaLife TV






                                                                               Call: 1-917-662-1122   eMail: [email protected]
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47