Page 38 - The Indian EYE 122923
P. 38

IMMIGRATION                                                        DECEMBER 29, 2023  |      The Indian Eye 38




           Personal conflicts of interest arising




                     out of the Israel-Hamas War






              he   escalating  war  able  representing  a  former  tionable.              related to, the conflict.  and  diligently  notwithstand-
              between Israel and  IDF soldier who expresses a     Pursuant to Model Rule     In other circumstances,  ing this limitation. However,
        THamas            presents  lack  of  regret  at  the  loss  of  1.7(a)(2)  of  the  American   though a lawyer may wish to  if it is important for the law-
        unique  challenges for immi-  lives  of  children  and  wants  Bar  Association  (ABA),  a   represent, or continue repre-  yer to be available to defend
        gration  lawyers  who  repre-  to  apply  for  adjustment  of  lawyer  shall  not  represent   senting a client, even though  the student’s actions in the
        sent noncitizens from impact-  status. Under some circum-  a client if a concurrent con-  a  personal  conflict  exists.  A  media as that might get the
        ed areas. One such ethical  stances, a lawyer will have a  flict of interest exists because   lawyer  who  finds  herself  in  client a better deal with the
        conundrum arises when a  personal  conflict  of  interest  “there is a significant risk that   this situation may seek a waiv-  prosecutors, and the lawyer is
        lawyer comes to know that a  if  there  is  a  significant  risk  the representation of one or   er of the conflict under ABA  unable to handle media inter-
        current or prospective client  that  the  lawyer’s  profession-  more clients will be materi-  Model Rule 1.7(b), provided  views on behalf of the client,
        holds views  about  the  con-  al judgment on behalf of the  ally  limited  by…a  personal   that  “the  lawyer  reasonably  then this potentially creates a
        flict  that  the  lawyer  strongly  client will be adversely affect-  interest of the lawyer”. While   believes  that  the  lawyer  will  non-waivable conflict and the
        disagrees  with  or  even  finds  ed  because  of  the  opposing  the  ABA  provides  model   be able to provide competent  lawyer must withdraw.
        repugnant.  A  lawyer  whose  views between the lawyer and  rules of professional respon-  and  diligent  representation   Immigration   lawyers
        family member was killed in  the client.              sibility,  lawyers  should  refer   to each affected client, the  may also find themselves rep-
        the October 7th attack might   Because    immigration  to the analog of these rules in   representation  is  not  pro-  resenting noncitizen students
        not wish to represent a client   lawyers  are  responsible  for  their own state bars that are   hibited  by  law….”,  and  the  in F-1 visa status who are fac-
        who  expresses  support  for  bringing  in  a  client  into  the  binding on them.   Thus, a   client  provides  consent.  For  ing  other  immigration-relat-
        Hamas, while a lawyer whose  US or allowing the client to  lawyer who feels uncomfort-  example, a lawyer who finds  ed consequences as a result
        relative was killed or injured  remain  in  the  US,  the  per-  able representing a client due   protests  opposing  Israel  ob-  being  involved  in  protests
        in the recent Israeli Defense  sonal conflict becomes more  to the client’s views on the   jectionable may be represent-  or making statements about
        Force (IDF) airstrikes in  enhanced if they find the cli-  conflict need not do so, and   ing  a  foreign  student  in  F-1  the  conflict.  University  of
        Gaza  may  not  feel  comfort-  ent’s views or conduct objec-  can  decline  the  representa-  status  who  has  vehemently  Pennsylvania  President  Liz
                                                                 tion. On the other hand,   protested  against  the  Israeli  Magill recently resigned after
                                                                  a  lawyer  need  not  shy   invasion of Gaza without ex-  appearing  to  evade  a  ques-
                                                                  away  from  representing   pressing any sympathy for the  tion asking whether students
                                                                  a  client,  however  ob-  victims of the Hamas attack  who called for a “genocide
                                                                  jectionable the conduct   on  October  7,  2023.  If  the  of Jews” should be punished.
                                                                  may be, so long as there   student client was involved  This  episode  demonstrates
                                                                  is a legal basis to repre-  in  a  protest  that  resulted  in  terminology  can  be  misun-
                                                                  sent the person.        a physical altercation with an  derstood,  and  how  easily  it
                                                                      If  a  lawyer  realizes   opposing group of protestors,  could  potentially  ensnare  a
                                                                  that  a  personal  conflict   he could be charged with as-  foreign  student  in  F-1  sta-
                                                                  of  interest  of  this  type   sault, potentially a removable  tus. While the term ‘intifada’
                                                                  exists with a current cli-  offense under INA § 237(a)  could  mean  an  ‘uprising’  or
                                                                  ent,  the  lawyer  can  still   (2)(A)(i).  The  lawyer  can  ‘shaking off’  (see here and
                                                                  withdraw  from  the  rep-  inform the student that she  here), it could also be under-
                                                                  resentation of a client   finds  the  student’s  conduct  stood as violent resistance
                                                                  whose views or activities   repugnant  but  may  still  be  tantamount to  “genocide”,
                                                                  she  finds  reprehensible   able to competently and dil-  as illustrated by the Congres-
                                                                  under ABA Model Rule    igently represent the student  sional hearing before Con-
                                                                  1.16(b)(4),  which  per-  by  advising  his  criminal  de-  gresswoman Stefanik during
                                                                  mits withdrawal if “the   fense lawyer to negotiate the  which  Magill  and  other  uni-
                                                                  client insists upon taking   assault charge to a disorderly  versity  presidents  testified.
                                                                  action  that  the  lawyer   conduct offense, which will  As we explained in our prior
                     m of                                         considers  repugnant  or   likely  not  have  deportation  blog, there is a potential for
          CYRUS D. MEHTA & PARTNERS PLLC                          with which the lawyer has   consequences. On the other  troubling consequences for
                                                                                          hand, the lawyer can inform  a noncitizen leader of a stu-
                                                                  a fundamental disagree-
                                                                                             ment”.  Alternatively,  a   the client that she will not be  dent organization who speaks
          
                          
  	                            
             lawyer  may  withdraw   able  to  justify  the  student’s  out  about  the  conflict  in  a
                                                                  from representation un-  conduct  in  a  press  briefing  way  that  seems  to  endorse
             	                                 
                      
                                                   
             ­       der  ABA  Model  Rule   or interview on behalf of the  terrorist  activity.    A  student
               €   
              ‚                                              
                                                                  1.16(b)(7) if “other good   client because she disagrees  who  is  on  an  F-1  visa  could
                                                                  cause for withdrawal    with his conduct and finds it  be found inadmissible under
                                                                  exists”,  which  could  in-  repugnant. If the client agrees  INA  §  212(a)(3)(B)(i)(IV)
                                                                  clude a fundamental dis-  to this sort of limited repre-  (bb)  as  a  representatives  of
          2              6th Floor                                agreement with a client’s   sentation, the lawyer can rep-  “a  political,  social,  or  other
                                                                  stance on, or activities   resent the client competently  group  that  endorses  or  es-
           
     
        	
     
         
              

                                                               www.TheIndianEYE.com
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43