Page 11 - The Indian EYE 120525
P. 11

OPINION                                                            DECEMBER 05, 2025       |  The Indian Eye 11



        Project 2025 had recommended that
        the incoming US administration re-
        ject the ratification of the CTBT and
        ‘indicate a willingness to conduct nu-
        clear tests in response to adversary
        nuclear developments if necessary’.
        It also recommended the restoration
        of nuclear  infrastructure,  including
        ‘readiness to test nuclear weapons at
        the Nevada National Security Site to
        ensure the ability of the U.S. to re-
        spond quickly to asymmetric technol-
        ogy surprises’. Further, the Report
        urged the incoming government to
        have ‘more than the bare minimum
        of nuclear modernization’ and ‘pre-
        pare to compete to secure US inter-
        ests should arms control efforts con-
        tinue to fail’.

         TRUMP’S NUCLEAR RHETORIC
              AND IMPLICATIONS

             irst, according to nuclear ex-
             perts,  the  2020  Compliance
        FReport’s  suspicions  regarding
        nuclear testing by Russia and China
        pointed to possible conduct of the             If Trump’s rhetoric indeed becomes a reality, it would be a death knell for the arms control architecture (File)
        sub-critical tests that do not involve
        nuclear fission. The subsequent 2024   any such findings. CTBTO Executive   may or may not materialize, satellite   matter  during  his  first  term,  as  well
        Compliance Report raised suspicions   Secretary Robert Floyd stated that   imagery and expert analysis reveal   as in the nuclear-related contents of
        based on previous reports, without   the  CTBTO’s  International  Moni-  significant expansion of nuclear test-  the  2020  and  2024  Compliance  re-
        adding any new information. The   toring System (IMS)               ing sites within Russia, China and the   ports and the nuclear-related issues
        US has been conducting such tests     “can and will detect any nuclear   US. Satellite images taken in May   outlined in the Project 2025 Report.
        at the Nevada National Security Site   weapon test explosion anywhere on   and June 2025 of the Russian nuclear   Trump’s justification for the proposed
        (NNSS) for years. More importantly,   the planet, and has successfully de-  testing site at Novaya Zemlya show   US nuclear tests fails when examined
        the US State Department fact sheet   tected all six declared nuclear tests   a significant expansion of infrastruc-  against evidence supported by the
        titled ‘Scope of the Comprehensive   conducted  this  century.  Any  explo-  ture compared to 2021.   CTBTO.
        Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty’ states that   sive nuclear weapon test by any State   A high level of activity at the site   Trump’s statements have already
        sub-critical nuclear testing is permit-  would be harmful and destabilizing for   suggests that Novaya Zemlya is pre-  undermined the nuclear taboo, and if
        ted under the CTBT. It notes:     global non-proliferation efforts and   pared for nuclear tests. In September   he goes ahead with tests, it will mark
            “Under the CTBT, supercritical   for international peace and security.”  2024, Rear Admiral Andrei Sinitsyn,   the end of the global arms control
        hydro-nuclear tests (which produce a   Third, Trump’s statements have   head of Russia’s central atomic test   architecture. The top three nuclear
        self-sustaining fission chain reaction)   already eroded the nuclear taboo   site  at  Novaya  Zemlya,  confirmed   powers have already started modern-
        are  banned  by  the  Treaty,  but  sub-  believed to be in place since the use   this in an interview with the Russian   izing  infrastructure  at  their  respec-
        critical hydrodynamic experiments,   of  the  atomic  bomb  in  1945,  which   government newspaper Rossiyskaya   tive nuclear testing sites, anticipating
        which do not produce a self-sustain-  restrains the use of nuclear rhetoric   Gazeta.                 a future need to resume nuclear test-
        ing fission chain reaction, are permit-  as well. Nuclear saber-rattling by the   Satellite imagery of Lop Nur   ing, which is perhaps the most con-
        ted.”                             custodian of the world’s second-larg-  indicates that China has been exca-  cerning factor for global peace and
            Therefore, while making his   est nuclear arsenal leads to rhetorical   vating vertical and horizontal tunnels   stability.
        claims regarding nuclear tests by oth-  normalization of escalation, weaken-  that could be utilized for future nucle-
        ers, Trump has failed to clarify the   ing the taboo further.       ar tests. Work has been ongoing since   Niranjan Chandrashekhar Oak is a
        nature of the tests by others to justify   Fourth, if Trump’s rhetoric in-  2020, and support facilities, including   Research Analyst at Manohar Parri-
        the US nuclear explosion tests.   deed becomes a reality, it would be   electrical infrastructure, have been   kar Institute for Defense Studies and
            Second, Trump’s allegations of   a  death  knell  for  the  arms  control   established. Similarly, the NNSS in   Analyses (MP-IDSA), New Delhi. His
        Russian and Chinese nuclear tests are   architecture. Although the CTBT   the US has experienced considerable   broad area of interest includes nuclear
        not backed by any concrete evidence.   has not come into force due to the   expansion of underground facilities   and security issues of the Indo-Pacific
        The Preparatory Commission for the   non-ratification  of  several  states,   between 2018 and 2023. Thus, it can   region
        Comprehensive    Nuclear-Test-Ban  it has been followed in spirit by all   be inferred that three major nuclear   Views expressed are of the author and
        Treaty  Organization  (CTBTO),  es-  countries, except North Korea. Re-  powers are readying infrastructure to   do not necessarily reflect the views of
        tablished to achieve the aims of the   sumption of nuclear testing will trig-  conduct future nuclear tests.  the Manohar Parrikar IDSA or of the
        CTBT, has a strong network of more   ger a chain reaction of tests by other                                  Government of India.
        than 300 facilities distributed across   states, leading to the collapse of the   CONCLUSION
        the globe to detect any sign of a pos-  CTBT. Such a possibility is also ultra   lthough  Trump’s  nuclear  This this article first appeared in the
        sible nuclear test. Trump’s claims of   vires in relation to Article VI of the   rhetoric came as a surprise   Comments section of the website (www.
        nuclear tests by other countries do   NPT, which discusses complete nu- Ato the international commu-   idsa.in) of Manohar Parrikar Institute
        not pass the scrutiny of the CTBTO,   clear disarmament.            nity, signs of his intentions were evi-  for Defense Studies and Analyses, New
        as the Organization has not produced   Fifth, while Trump’s rhetoric   dent throughout his opinions on this   Delhi, on November 27, 2025


                                                               www.TheIndianEYE.com
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16