Page 11 - The Indian EYE 042624
P. 11

OPINION                                                                 APRIL 26, 2024     |  The Indian Eye 11



        and, by extension, the global econom-
        ic stability. For instance, Brent Crude
        prices shot up to $ 91.71 on 12 April
        when Iran captured a container ship
        near  the  Strait of Hormuz and  de-
        clared that it would attack Israel and
        fell down to $ 89.24 on 15 April, after
        Israel and its partners repelled the at-
        tacks.
            The Iranian regime’s calculated
        response to the embassy bombing,
        therefore, must be viewed through the
        prism of its domestic political strate-
        gy, aimed at maintaining its grip on
        power amidst a tumultuous internal
        and external landscape. This strate-
        gic posture reflects a broader pattern
        in Iranian foreign policy: leveraging
        military engagements as a tool for
        domestic political maneuvering, all
        the while navigating the precarious
        balance of regional power dynamics
        and the risks of broader conflict esca-
        lation.

         ISRAEL’S RESPONSE AND THE                  Israel stands at a critical crossroads, where strategic patience and restraint are juxtaposed against the compelling
         ROLE OF THE UNITED STATES                                          impulse for retributive action (Agency photo)

                 hile the United States Pres-
                 ident has reiterated his                                   tition with Beijing.
        W“ironclad commitment to              Firstly, Israel is acutely aware of                             compelling impulse for retributive ac-
                                                                                Third, is the potential influence of
        security of Israel”, he has also advised   the complexities and challenges of en-  the Jewish lobby in the US, an import-  tion. The considerations are manifold,
                                                                                                              encompassing the immediate threats
                                          gaging in military conflicts on multiple
        Israel to de-escalate as both countries   fronts. Iran’s significant influence and   ant factor at any time especially given   posed by Iran’s network in Lebanon
        are now “even”. Israel is at a junc-  network within Lebanon, primarily   upcoming elections. The US secretary   and Syria, the broader regional risks
        ture where it can escalate or choose   through Hezbollah, and its presence   of state, Antony Blinken had a meet-  of escalation, and the global geopolit-
        not to. One immediate consideration   in Syria, pose a considerable threat to   ing with various Jewish groups, where   ical shifts, notably the United States’
        is the potential escalation of military   Israel’s northern border. Escalating   he told the representatives that the   strategic pivot towards the Indo-Pa-
        actions. Given the scale of the attack   tensions with Iran could activate these   US did not want Israel to “escalate”   cific  region  and  its  implications  for
        and  the demonstrated  capability to   proxies, drawing Israel into a mul-  after the attack. While all the repre-  American engagement in the Middle
        intercept a vast majority of the incom-  tifaceted  conflict  that  would  stretch   sentatives thanked the US for the ‘de-  East. These factors collectively sug-
        ing threats, Israel might opt to rein-  its military resources and potentially   fence of Israel’, Blinken’s stand was   gest a path of cautious engagement
        force its deterrence posture against   put civilian populations at risk. The   supported by the liberal lobbies, but   and strategic de-escalation for Israel,
        Iran. As Iran has directly attacked   historical context of conflicts in these   some centrist and right-wing lobbies   mindful of the complex interplay of
        Israel, it has crossed a threshold and   areas demonstrates the high costs and   called on the US to “support whatever   internal security needs, regional sta-
        Israel would be thinking that if it does   complexities of such engagements,   decision Israel  takes”. These overall   bility, and international diplomacy.
        not respond to Iran’s attacks it might   making a focused approach on de-es-  considerations are likely to influence   As the dust settles on this latest
        become a new normal. Israel’s policy   calation and containment a prudent   an Israeli decision to respond.  episode  of  confrontation,  the  path
        of deterrence has consistently been   strategy for Israel.                                            forward demands a judicious mix
        a focal point among the nation’s po-  Second, the United States, Israel’s    CONCLUSION               of diplomatic engagement, military
        litical and military elite, considered   key strategic ally, has been recalibrat-                     readiness, and strategic patience.
        a crucial component of its defense                                     n conclusion, the escalation on   The international community’s col-
        strategy. This approach encompasses   ing its foreign policy priorities, with a   April 14, 2024, between Iran   lective response, emphasizing diplo-
        military tactics such as retaliating to   notable pivot towards addressing the   Iand  Israel,  marks  a  significant   macy over military escalation, offers a
        past assaults and sustaining military   rise of China. The U.S. is increasingly   moment in the complex tapestry of   hopeful avenue towards de-escalating
        readiness, as well as the utilization of   concerned with the strategic competi-  Middle Eastern geopolitics. Iran’s   tensions and fostering a more stable
        both soft and hard power to convince   tion in the Indo-Pacific region, aiming   assertive military action and Israel’s   and secure Middle East. Ultimately,
        adversaries that launching any attack   to counterbalance China’s growing   calibrated defensive response under-  the events of April 14, 2024, serve as
        would be futile. This could involve   economic and military influence. This   score the delicate balance of power,   a poignant reminder of the intercon-
        targeted strikes against Iranian mil-  pivot signifies a desire by the U.S. to   regional influence, and international   nectedness  of  regional  conflicts  and
        itary assets or proxies in the region,   avoid being entangled in protracted   diplomacy that defines the region. As   the importance of collective efforts
        aimed at degrading Iran’s ability to   conflicts  in  the  Middle  East,  which   both nations navigate the aftermath   towards securing peace and stability
        launch similar attacks in the future.   could divert attention and resources   of this confrontation, the broader   in an increasingly complex and inter-
        Such actions would likely be calibrat-  from  the  Indo-Pacific  theater.  The   implications for regional stability, in-  connected world.
        ed to send a clear message of strength   U.S. administration’s caution towards   ternational alliances, and global eco-
        without necessarily provoking a full-  escalation in the Middle East is likely   nomic health loom large.   This article first appeared
        scale  conflict.  However,  while  Israel   influenced  by  this  broader  strategic   Israel  stands at a critical  cross-  on the website (www.claws.in) of Centre
        would be tempted to retaliate, there   framework,  as  Washington  seeks  to   roads, where strategic patience and   for Land Warfare Studies, New Delhi,
        are factors that needs consideration.  maintain focus on long-term compe-  restraint are juxtaposed against the   on April 18, 2024


                                                               www.TheIndianEYE.com
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16