Page 10 - The Indian EYE 012624
P. 10

OPINION                                                             JANUARY 26, 2024       |  The Indian Eye 10


                               Gilgit-Baltistan and




           Its Saga of Unending Human





                                     Rights Violations








           The Gilgit-Baltistan region has been devoid of political and constitutional rights since Pakistan occupied it.
          The author states that the leading cause behind this violence is the population’s simmering discontent with the

                        absence of genuine democratic and constitutional mechanism to resolve their problem


        ASHU MAAN

              s  evident  from  the  title,  the
              author  tries  to  draw  atten-
        Ation  to  umpteen  human
        rights  violations  by  Pakistan  in  the
        Gilgit-Baltistan  region.  Alok  Bansal
        points towards the sectarian violence
        prevalent in Gilgit-Baltistan since the
        1980s. He also mentions the complic-
        ity of the Pakistan State apparatus in
        unfolding  violence  against  the  Shia
        and Ismailia population of the region.
        He states how the state has enabled
        Sunni hardliners from mainland Pa-
        kistan  to  settle  into  the  region  and
        perpetrate hate and violence against
        the Shias. Alok Bansal writes:
            “The  Karakoram  Highway  con-
        nected  Pakistan  to  Gilgit-Baltistan,
        which till then had been virtually in-
        accessible  for  an  average  Pakistani
        citizen.  This  started  changing  the
        demographic composition of this del-
        icate region. Along with others seek-
        ing  economic  gains,  many  religious   The leading cause behind the violence in the region is the population’s simmering discontent with the absence of genuine democratic and
        fanatics also moved into the region,                          constitutional mechanism to resolve their problem (File photo)
        who  brought  with  them  their  own
        radical ideology” (Pages 90-91).
            Along  with  highlighting  human   Alok Bansal is right in his asser-  dence  of  historical  linkages  of  Jam-  kistani academics, often supported by
        rights  abuse  and  sectarian  violence,   tion, as Gilgit-Baltistan has not only   mu, Kashmir, Ladakh, and Gilgit in   Western scholars that Gilgit-Baltistan
        the  author  also  touched  on  the  le-  been missing from policy and public   each  period.  He  highlights  Hiuen   has been a separate entity and never a
        gality  of  Pakistan’s  claims  on  Gilg-  discourse  but  also  from  academ-  Tsang’s writing about officials respon-  part of Kashmir, hence India.
        it-Baltistan,  the  political  history  of   ic  discourse.  Alok  Bansal  starts  the   sible for blinding Prince Kunal, being   The  book  exposes  Pakistan’s
        Kashmir  coupled  with  Ladakh  and   first  chapter  with  a  historical  back-  banished by Emperor Ashoka to the   nefarious  designs  to  change  the  de-
        Gilgit-Baltistan, UN resolutions, and   ground  starting  from  the  pre-Mau-  West of Khotan. He also writes about   mography and culture of the region.
        economic exploitations of the region   ryan period, the rule of Hindu kings   the  inscriptions  and  carvings  found   The different castes of Shias (Twelver
        by Pakistan. Through this book, Alok   in ancient India, then passing on to   at Haldeikish in Hunza Valley, Chi-  Shias, Zaidiyyah, Ismaili) formed al-
        Bansal reiterates the region’s strate-  Muslim  kings  during  the  medieval   las, and Alam Bridge along the Gilgit   most  ninety  percent  of  the  majority
        gic, cultural, geographical, and demo-  period, followed by the rule of Mu-  River i.e. Gilgit and Skardu. He also   in the region in the 1970s. Also to be
        graphical importance.             ghals,  Afghans,  Sikhs,  before  finally   talks of Akbar’s invasion of Baltistan   noted is the fact that, despite being
            Alok Bansal starts the book by stat-  coming  back  to  the  Hindu  Kings.   and Ladakh and the marriage of the   predominantly Muslim, people in the
        ing one disconcerting hypothesis. He   One common variable in all the pe-  princess  of  Baltistan  to  Salim.  The   area still follow Buddhist cultural tra-
        says that: “Gilgit-Baltistan has not at-  riods was that Kashmir, Ladakh (in-  author proves the historical linkages   ditions. The culture and demography
        tracted the requisite interest of the In-  cluding  Baltistan),  and  Gilgit  were   of India to Jammu and Kashmir and   of  Gilgit-Baltistan  were  unaccept-
        dian policymakers, academic scholars,   always  an  integral  part  of  India  or   Kashmir to Ladakh and Gilgit-Baltis-  able to President Zia-ul-Haq. Zia-ul-
        media or the general public at large”.  a vassal state. The author gives evi-  tan to counter the propaganda of Pa-  Continued on next page... >>


                                                               www.TheIndianEYE.com
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15